How Bankruptcy Could Affect your South Carolina Divorce

bankruptcy image

Bankruptcy can have huge implications for your Divorce in South Carolina both procedurally and practically.  For starters, bankruptcy proceedings place an automatic stay on certain areas of Family Court litigation involving marital assets, debts, and the equitable distribution thereof.  However, an automatic stay created by a bankruptcy proceeding may be resolved so long as you have a consent order from the bankruptcy court which effectively lifts the stay in order to resolve the marital issues.  Such consent orders normally require additional relief from the stay in order to enforce an obligation created in Family Court against the property of the estate.

It is important to note that there are certain actions within Family Court which are not stayed by bankruptcy proceedings.  11 U.S.C. 362(b)(2) delineates those actions which are exempt from the automatic stay created by bankruptcy as follows: 1) actions for the establishment of paternity 2) actions for the establishment or modification of an order for domestic support obligations 3) actions concerning child custody or visitation 4) actions for the dissolution of a marriage, except to the extent that such proceeding seeks to determine the division of property that is property of the estate 5) actions regarding domestic violence 6) actions involving the collection of a domestic support obligation from property that is not property of the estate.

As you may have noticed, several of the exemptions mentioned above involve “domestic support obligations.”  As domestic support obligations (hereinafter “DSO”) are not dischargeable in bankruptcy proceedings, it is exceedingly important to understand what they are.  11 U.S.C. 101(14) defines DSOs as 1) a debt which has accrued or will accrue in the past, present or future, which 2) is owed to a spouse, former spouse, or child of the debtor or such child’s parent, legal guardian or responsible relative 3) for the purpose of alimony, maintenance, or “support” of such persons and 4) which has been established pursuant to a separation agreement, divorce decree or property settlement agreement. South Carolina case law has defined “support,” for the purposes of the above, to mean any order which requires support for necessary shelter, food, clothing, care, medical attention, educational expenses and other proper and reasonable expenses.  All domestic obligations are non-dischargeable in Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, but in order to survive Chapter 13 bankruptcy the obligation MUST be a DSO.

Knowing that certain obligations created in divorce proceeding may be dischargeable in bankruptcy, one must consider the implications of the language used while crafting Agreements in order to avoid (or ensure) bankruptcy discharge.  A good Agreement will include labels for certain obligation-creating provisions such as “alimony,” “property division,” “support,” “equitable division,” etc.  The Agreement should also include descriptive words with regard to labels placed on the obligations such as “required,” “needs,” “modifiable/non-modifiable,” “inability to pay,” “standard of living,” “waiver,” etc.  Finally, one may simply track the statutory language relevant to DSOs in order to ensure an obligation is or is not discharged, or even go so far as to spell out in detail the reasoning behind the provision behind the obligation (i.e.  Wife shall pay “X” obligation to Wife because Husband is unemployed through no fault of his own and cannot afford to repay “Y”  housing loan without the financial assistance from Wife who has always been the primary wage earner.”

In the event, you find yourself going through a divorce in South Carolina, please be aware of how bankruptcy proceedings may affect your case both during and after the litigation is over.  Further, if your attorney has not already done so, make sure he or she discusses how the language in your Agreement protects you with regard to bankruptcy discharge moving forward.

 

Bookmark and Share

Social Security Benefits after your South Carolina Divorce:

social security image

When you become divorced in South Carolina, it is important to understand how your change in marital status can affect various rights you or your spouse may have. One potential right that may be implicated is your right to claim Social Security benefits, and it is important to understand your options so that you may make informed decisions moving forward.

For example, if your marriage lasted longer than ten (10) years, you may receive benefits on your ex-spouses’ record if you remain unmarried (unless your new spouse died), are age 62 or older, your ex-spouse is entitled to Social Security retirement or disability benefits AND the benefit you are entitled to receive based on your own work is less than you would received based on your ex-spouses’ work. Additionally, so long as you’ve been divorced for two (2) years, you can receive benefits on your ex-spouses’ record even if they have not applied for benefits so long as they are eligible. If you meet these requirements you may choose to claim the “divorced spousal benefit” which would be equal to one-half of your ex-spouses’ full retirement or disability benefit so long as you wait until your full retirement age.

It is worth noting that you also have certain options when choosing whether or not to exercise your ability to elect the ‘divorced spousal benefit.” For example, if you are eligible for your own retirement benefits, Social Security will pay that amount first, but if the benefit on your ex-spouses’ record is higher, you will get a combination of the benefits that equals the higher amount. Also, if both you and your ex-spouse are eligible for benefits and have reached full retirement age, it may behoove you to elect to receive only your ex-spouses’ benefits now while deferring your own benefits to a later date.

No matter what decisions you make for yourself, and no matter the issue, it is crucial to understand your options so that the decision you do make is a smart one. If you find yourself going through a divorce in South Carolina, be mindful of the options available to you with regard to Social Security benefits.

Bookmark and Share

New Law Makes it Easier for Grandparents to get Visitation in South Carolina

GRANDPARENT-VISITATION

The South Carolina statute regarding grandparent visitation was amended via bill <H4348>on June 9, 2014. The amended statute makes it a bit easier for grandparents to get visitation in South Carolina, as grandparents are no longer required to show that they have a relationship with their grandchild akin to a parent-child relationship prior to receiving court-ordered visitation. S.C. Code §63-3-530 (A)(33) (the grandparent statute) now provides that the Family Court has jurisdiction to order visitation for the grandparent of a minor child:
…where either or both parents of the minor child is or are deceased, or are divorced, or are living separate and apart in different habitats, if the court finds that:
1)     the child’s parents or guardians are unreasonably depriving the grandparent of the opportunity to visit with the child, including denying visitation of the minor child to the grandparent for a period exceeding ninety days; and
2)    awarding grandparent visitation would not interfere with the parent-child relationship; and
a)    the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the child’s parents or guardians are unfit; or
b)    the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that there are compelling circumstances to overcome the presumption that the parental decision is in the child’s best interest.

For some additional insight as to the new statute’s implications for grandparent visitation in South Carolina, please visit my friend and colleague’s website to view his blog post, <”South Carolina finally does grandparent visitation rights right”>.
This statute only applies to “grandparents,” which is defined within the statute itself as a “natural or adoptive parent of a natural or adoptive parent of a minor child.” However, there are still ways for a non-grandparent third-party to get custody of a child if certain elements are proven and burdens met. For example, as described in Moore v. Moore, 200 S.C. 75, 386 S.E.2d 456 (1989), custody may be awarded to non-parents when the parents are deemed unfit or when the parents relinquish their rights.  In determining a contest between a parent and a non-parent, the family court will consider the following four (4) factors:
1)      Whether the parent is fit and able to care for the child and provide a good home;
2)      The amount of contact (as evidence by visitation, financial support or both) which the parent had while the child was in the care of a third-party;
3)      The circumstances under which temporary relinquishment occurred; and
4)      The degree of attachment between the child and the temporary custodian
Nonetheless, it is important to understand that a rebuttable presumption favors the parent over a third-party.
South Carolina also recognizes the doctrines of “Psychological Parents” and “De Facto Custodians.”
A psychological parent is defined in Middleton v. Johnson 369 S.C. 585, 633 S.E.2d 162 (Ct.App.2006) as someone who, on a continuing day-to-day basis, through interaction, companionship, interplay and mutuality, fulfills a child’s psychological and physical needs for a parent and provides for the child’s emotional and financial support.  For a third-party to show they are a psychological parent they must meet the following four (4) requirements:
1)      The biological or adoptive parent(s) consented to and fostered the formation and establishment of a parent-like relationship with the child;
2)      The petitioner and the child lived together in the same household;
3)      The petitioner assumed obligations of parenthood by taking significant responsibility for the child’s care, education and development, including contributing towards the child’s support, without expectation of financial compensation; and
4)      The petitioner has been in a parental role for a length of time sufficient to have established with the child a bonded, dependent relationship parental in nature.

De Facto Custodian:
S.C. Code Ann. § 63-15-60, also allows for grandparents or other third-parties to qualify as “de facto custodians” when contesting custody of a biological parent.  In order for a third-party to show that they are a de facto custodian, they must show by clear and convincing evidence to have been the primary caregiver for and financial supporter of a child who:
1)    has resided with the person for a period of six months or more if the child is under three years of age; or
2)    has resided with the person for a period of one year or more if the child is three years of age or older.

If you are a grandparent or a third-party with questions about your rights to visitation or custody in the State of South Carolina, I would be more than happy to speak with you about your options.

Bookmark and Share